Minto Pyramid Principle by Barbara Minto
Minto Pyramid Principle: this article offers a practical explanation of the Minto Pyramid Principle, developed by Barbara Minto. Next to what it is (the basics), this article also highlights the structure and it’s applicability. Also the advanatges and disadvantegs of the this principle are being discussed. Enjoy reading!
What is the Minto Pyramid Principle? The basics
Minto Pyramid Principle, also referred to as the McKinsey’s Pyramid Principle, is a tool used to process and structure large amounts of information to convey a story, message or presentation without omitting important details.
The principle of the McKinsey Pyramid is to cut to the chase in written texts or presentations. This ensures that the audience’s attention is captured and that a riveting story can be created that’s easy to remember and understand.
The Minto Pyramid Principle is applied by structuring points and arguments after the thesis statement has been introduced. The information that is presented subsequently branches off to the specific details in a clear and insightful manner.
‘The Pyramid Principle’, a book written by Barbara Minto, was published in the 1970s by McKinsey & Company. Barbara Minto was responsible for training new recruits into becoming expert consultants in the shortest possible time.

Figure 1 – the Minto Pyramid Principle
Structure
Writing texts, giving presentations or making recommendations based on the Minto Pyramid Principle is done by applying the following three levels of the pyramid:
1. Start with the answer, thesis or key point
Applying the top-down structure of a pyramid in communication methods means that a direct answer is given to the question that has been asked. These could also be recommendations, the results from a study, thesis statement or other key points.
Minto Pyramid Principle inverts the traditional method that’s used to arrive at a conclusion. Usually, the conclusion in a text or presentation is given after the facts have been presented, and all analyses and supporting ideas have been discussed.
With her Pyramid Principle, Barbara Minto explains why the answer is first given in a clear and concrete form. Only then must the supporting reasons or motivations be given. The first reason for this is to maximise and effectively use the limited time of the audience.
In most conversations with a supervisor, for instance, recommendations are made. The reason to first make the recommendation and then offer the motivation is that the supervisors often already see the conclusion or recommendation coming when a flood of arguments and reasons is provided. This because they think in such a top-down way, focusing on the bigger picture.
Moreover, a direct communication method is more convincing than a conversation that beats about the bush. A direct communication style is a display of assertiveness and self-confidence.
2. Group arguments and summarise the main points
Now that the key point has been laid down, the arguments, reasons or motivation for giving the presentation must be discussed.
According to the Minto Pyramid Principle, this level is about joining all arguments in main points. Each point represents a summary of specific support for the recommendation or the answer from the first step.
3. Present supporting details and ideas in a logical manner
Subsequently, the pyramid branches out from each argument to the lowest level where supporting details and ideas are given that must show the validity of the presented arguments. The whole of these three levels forms the pyramid structure.
Always first give the summarising idea, on the top of the pyramid. Clarity and logic can be applied in the story by paying attention to the structure and order.
If the arguments and ideas that are given contain a certain flow, frequency or cause-effect structure, these must be placed in chronological order. It’s also recommended to first present the most important arguments and ideas.
Minto Pyramid Principle and it’s applicability
It’s not surprising that the pyramid principle arose in the organisational consulting branch. That’s exactly where larger and more complex writing tasks is the order of the day. By structuring texts by means of this Principle, the texts are shortened, become clearer and are easier to follow.
This also has a great advantage for the writer himself. By thinking about the cohesion between ideas beforehand, these can be put to paper more efficiently and the main and auxiliary matters can more easily be distinguished.
Facts and thoughts are organised in a way that makes the text more convincing. Moreover, training with such a structure also has the benefit of the person choosing his words more carefully in everyday life, including on the work floor.
By removing all irrelevant matters, the core takes front and centre and the user increases the potential to climb up the hierarchy.
Advantages and disadvantages in using the Minto Pyramid Principle
According to Barbara Minto, using this Principle offers several advantages compared to other writing structures:
- More efficient writing because thoughts and ideas are organised in advance
- It helps the reader because reading strategies have been incorporated into the text itself
- Consistent quality
- Greater persuasion
- The Minto Pyramid Principle matches the way the human brain works
However, there are also disadvantages concerned with the use of the Minto Pyramid Principle:
- The tool demands a lot of training to create better texts
- There is a danger of repeating information
- And this makes it difficult to formulate an insightful synthesis
- Minto Pyramid Principle is mainly effective for texts with an unambiguous conclusion or recommendation, and not for other types of texts
Recommended books and publications on the Minto Pyramid Principle
The Minto Pyramid Principle helps structure information in a clear, logical, and persuasive way. The method starts with the core message and then works step by step toward arguments, supporting evidence, and details. The books and publications listed below provide additional insight into pyramid writing, business communication, argument structure, clear thinking, persuasive presenting, and organizing complex information.
- Anderson, P. V. (2016). Technical communication: A reader-centered approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. → This book helps you view communication from the reader’s perspective. This aligns well with the Minto pyramid principle, because the message does not start with everything the writer knows, but with what the reader needs to understand first. This order makes a significant difference, especially when dealing with technical or complex information.
- Argenti, P. A. (2017). Strategic communication in the c-suite. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 146-160. → This article demonstrates why clear and strategic communication is important at the executive and board levels. This aligns well with the Minto approach. Decision-makers often have limited time and want to quickly understand the core issue, why it is important, and what choice or action is required.
- Bovée, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (2018). Business communication today. Harlow, England: Pearson. → A comprehensive resource on business communication. The book covers topics such as writing, presenting, persuading, and structuring. This makes it useful for readers who want to apply the Minto Pyramid principle in emails, reports, proposals, and presentations.
- Graham, J., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. Alliance for Excellent Education. → This publication focuses on writing strategies and demonstrates that planning, summarizing, structuring, and revising help strengthen texts. This aligns with the Minto Pyramid Principle, in which the writer first considers the logical structure before working out the details.
- Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2021). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. → This book focuses primarily on academic writing but is also useful for business communication. It helps to clearly position arguments and logically link them to existing insights. This aligns with Minto, because a good text not only provides information but also demonstrates how points are connected.
- Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26. → This article examines writing as a thinking process. This is relevant to the Minto Pyramid principle, because pyramidal writing is not merely a formatting trick. It forces the writer to first clarify the core, the logic, and the arguments. As a result, writing also becomes a way to think more clearly.
- Locker, K. O., & Kaczmarek, S. K. (2009). Business communication: Building critical skills. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. → This source is also mentioned in the Toolshero article and provides a practical foundation for business communication. The book helps tailor messages to the purpose, audience, and context. This is important for the Minto Pyramid Principle, because the structure must always align with what the reader or listener needs.
- Minto, B. (2009). The Pyramid Principle: Logic in Writing and Thinking. Harlow, England: Pearson Education. → This is the core source behind the Minto Pyramid Principle. Minto explains how to start with the main message and then logically group arguments. The book is particularly valuable for consultants, managers, and professionals who need to present complex analyses concisely, clearly, and persuasively.
- >Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2019). Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. → This source delves into the argumentative side of writing. This is useful for the Minto Pyramid Principle, because a clear structure only becomes persuasive when the underlying arguments are strong. The source helps to better organize claims, evidence, assumptions, and counterarguments.
- Reynolds, G. (2019). Presentation Zen: Simple Ideas on Presentation Design and Delivery (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: New Riders. → This book aligns well with the application of Minto in presentations. Reynolds emphasizes simplicity, focus, and a clear narrative. This fits with pyramidal communication, because the audience must first understand the core before supporting details gain value.
- Rienecker, L., & Jørgensen, P. S. (2013). The good paper: A handbook for writing papers in higher education. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur. → This resource is particularly useful for students and researchers. The book helps to better align the main question, argumentation, and structure. This aligns with Minto, because a good text begins with a clear central message and a logical arrangement of supporting points.
- Williams, J. M., & Bizup, J. (2017). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. → This book is about writing clearly and elegantly. It is a good complement to Minto, because structure and style reinforce each other. A text can be logically structured but still difficult to read if sentences are too heavy or too abstract. This resource helps make the message simpler and more powerful.
How to cite this article:
Janse, B. (2018). Minto Pyramid Principle. Retrieved [insert date] from Toolshero.com: https://www.toolshero.com/communication-methods/minto-pyramid-principle/
Original publication date: January 16, 2018 | Last update: May 29, 2026
Add a link to this page on your website:
<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/communication-methods/minto-pyramid-principle/”> Toolshero.com: Minto Pyramid Principle</a>
2 responses to “Minto Pyramid Principle by Barbara Minto”
Thank you for this interesting article! Maybe an example would explain better the advantage of this system.
Thank you for your comment and suggestion, Georges. An example would be a nice add-on in this article. I will discuss it with the author. Have a good day!