Train the Trainer Principle: Meaning, Step-by-Step Guide, and Example

The train the trainer principle helps organizations ensure that knowledge isn’t confined to a single trainer, but is shared more widely and consistently. This is useful when many people need to learn the same methodology, skill, or instruction. You first train a group of internal trainers so that they can subsequently deliver the training themselves to colleagues or teams. This allows you to spread knowledge more quickly, keeps the content more closely aligned with real-world practice, and reduces the organization’s dependence on external trainers.

In this article, you’ll discover what the train the trainer principle entails, the various terms used to describe it, and how to set up a train the trainer program step by step. You’ll also learn what to look for when selecting trainers, formulating learning objectives, conducting practice sessions, providing feedback, and evaluating performance. Additionally, you’ll find a real-world example, as well as the benefits, risks, and prerequisites for effectively ensuring the quality of training sessions. Enjoy the read.

What is the “train the trainer” principle? Meaning and explanation

Train the trainer (TTT) is a principle widely used in the workplace. It means that a trainer trains other employees and, at the same time, teaches them how to train others.

The training is intended for (novice) trainers, teachers, and instructors to help them optimize and professionalize their current methods.
The following questions are central to this:

• How do you present yourself to the group?
• How do you come across as a trainer?
• How do people react to you?
• Self-direction: What does it mean? Where are the limits of self-direction?
• What skills do you need as a trainer? What training style suits you best?

During the training, the focus is primarily on developing your personal style as a trainer.

Together with an experienced trainer, you’ll focus on designing an effective training session, from preparation to evaluation. You’ll explore who your target audience is and what makes your participants satisfied.

It’s important that you personally experience the impact of the different ways you can convey knowledge. You’ll gain this insight by applying various teaching methods.

In short: you’ll learn how to prepare for a training session as effectively as possible. Finally, at the end of the training, we’ll review the results; the goal is for you to gain new insights and skills.

Train the Trainer, Train the Trainer, and Training of Trainers

“Train the Trainer” is referred to in various ways in practice. The Dutch term is derived from the English Train the Trainer. The term Training of Trainers, often abbreviated as ToT, is also commonly used. These terms essentially refer to the same training principle.

In Train the Trainer, participants are not only trained to apply specific knowledge or skills themselves; they also learn how to convey this knowledge to others in a clear and effective manner. After completing the program, participants thus take on the role of trainer, instructor, or facilitator themselves.

Train the Trainer is sometimes also referred to as a cascade model. In this model, a central trainer first trains a small group of internal trainers. These trainers then pass on the training to other groups within the organization. This allows knowledge to be disseminated relatively quickly and on a larger scale.

Although the terms are often used interchangeably, the specifics can vary by organization. Some programs focus primarily on presenting and facilitating groups. Other programs also cover teaching methods, learning psychology, developing training materials, providing feedback, and assessing learning outcomes.

“Train the Trainer” is therefore not a fixed model with a single mandatory approach. It is primarily a training concept designed to prepare people to train others in a professional and consistent manner.

Train the Trainer: getting started (including examples)

There are various training companies that offer such a programme. You can opt for a one-day course, but there are also courses that last a week. It goes without saying that these courses varying from one to five days concern vastly different content.

During a good training the trainer, a trainer doesn’t just tell the participants what they should learn; they also show them how to teach. Internal trainers learn how to actively listen with empathy, how to convey ideas and how to create courses that employees can easily understand.

The five important points for effectively completing a Training the Trainer course

1. Start with the goal of a trainer

Ask yourself the following questions:

• What does the role of a trainer mean to you?
• Do you want to develop skills?
• Do you want to change your attitude?
• Is it your job to convey knowledge?

By answering these questions, you can determine what type of trainer you need.

2. Consider educational psychology

An effective course treats the relevant educational psychology and how the trainer can use this psychology, both in designing and delivering the learning options.

A good understanding of educational psychology will enable the trainer to guide the students more effectively while training them, as they’re able to respond to situations when these begin to arise.

3. Develop objectives and an assessment process

Trainers and students must be able to design goals based on behaviour and realistic assessments to measure the outcome of the course. In that case, both work on a series of objectives based on behaviour. At the end of the course, they’ll know whether they have or haven’t achieved these.

4. Make sure the content of lessons supports the objectives

The content of lessons should be related to the objectives.

5. Make it interactive

Make sure the lessons are interactive. Engage your students in dialogue and work with the various senses.

How does the train the trainer principle work, step by step?

The train-the-trainer principle works best when the training program is structured according to a set framework. This involves more than just transferring subject matter knowledge; future trainers must also learn how to guide, motivate, and evaluate others.

The exact details vary by organization. The steps below provide a practical foundation for setting up and implementing a train-the-trainer program.

Step 1: Analyze the training needs

Start with the problem that the training is intended to solve. Identify which knowledge or skills are lacking within the organization and which employees need to be trained.

Ask questions such as:

• What should participants be able to do differently after the training?
• What knowledge or skills need to be imparted?
• Who is the target audience for the training?
• Why are in-house trainers used?
• What results does the organization expect?

A clear needs analysis prevents the program from becoming too general. This allows the content to be better tailored to real-world practice.

Step 2: Select suitable trainers

Not every subject matter expert is automatically a good trainer. A prospective trainer must be able to combine subject matter knowledge with communication skills, patience, and the ability to guide others.

When selecting trainers, consider the following, among other things:

• subject-matter expertise;
• motivation to help others learn;
• communication skills;
• openness to feedback;
• the ability to speak in front of a group;
• enough time to prepare and conduct training sessions.

A participant does not need to be an experienced trainer yet. However, it is important that the person is eager to practice and willing to further develop their own training style.

Step 3: Define the learning objectives

Next, describe what the future trainers should know and be able to do by the end of the program. Make the learning objectives as specific as possible.

For example, a learning objective could be that the trainer:

• be able to prepare a training session independently;
• can clearly explain the course material;
• can select appropriate teaching methods;
• can actively engage participants in the training;
• can address questions and resistance;
• can give and receive feedback;
• can assess learning outcomes.

Specific learning objectives guide the content, the exercises, and the trainer’s final assessment.

Step 4: Develop the training program

Based on the learning objectives, determine which topics should be covered in the program. Ensure a good balance between theory, demonstration, practice, and reflection.

A train-the-trainer program can focus on:

• learning psychology and adult learning;
• formulating learning objectives;
• designing a training program;
• selecting appropriate teaching methods;
• present and explain;
• group dynamics and resistance;
• feedback and evaluation;
• transfer to the workplace.

The content must always be relevant to the situations in which the trainers will later be working themselves.

Step 5: Demonstrate the desired approach

An experienced trainer demonstrates how to prepare and conduct an effective training session. This allows participants not only to experience what works, but also to see how various training skills come together.

After the demonstration, the group discusses, for example:

• how the trainer opened the session;
• how the explanation was structured;
• which teaching methods were used;
• how participants were engaged;
• how questions and responses were addressed;
• how understanding of the material was assessed.

By making the approach visible, participants are given a concrete example they can build upon.

Step 6: Let participants practice on their own

Future trainers must be given ample opportunity to practice on their own. This can start with a short presentation or a small section of the training.

Later, they can conduct a full practice training session, with the other participants taking on the role of trainees.

During the practice session, it becomes clear:

• whether the explanation is understandable;
• whether the structure is logical;
• whether the trainer connects well with the group;
• whether the chosen teaching methods support learning;
• how the trainer responds to questions or unexpected situations.

Practice helps participants discover their own training style and develop greater confidence in front of the group.

Step 7: Observe and Provide Specific Feedback

After each exercise, the participant receives specific feedback. This feedback should not only identify areas for improvement but also highlight what is already going well.

Use pre-determined observation criteria. For example, look for:

• preparation and structure;
• clarity of the explanation;
• use of questions and teaching methods;
• interaction with participants;
• Pace and time management;
• dealing with resistance;
• assessing learning outcomes.

Encourage participants to reflect on their own experiences. Ask them what they hoped to achieve, what they thought went well, and what they would do differently in a future training session.

Step 8: Assess whether the trainer is ready to lead a training session independently

At the end of the program, an assessment is conducted to determine whether the participant is sufficiently prepared to conduct a training session independently.

This assessment may include:

• a knowledge test;
• a detailed training plan;
• an observed practice session;
• feedback from participants;
• a personal reflection report.

Use clear evaluation criteria. This way, every participant knows in advance what is expected, and the quality of different trainers can be evaluated consistently.

Step 9: Supervise the first training sessions in practice

A trainer’s development doesn’t stop after the train-the-trainer course. The first training sessions in practice often raise new questions and reveal areas for improvement.

Therefore, have an experienced trainer observe or be available to provide support. Discuss the following afterward:

• what went well;
• what participants struggled with;
• which parts needed more explanation;
• how the trainer handled unexpected situations;
• what could be improved in the next training session.

This guidance helps participants actually apply what they’ve learned in practice.

Step 10: Evaluate and improve the program

Regularly assess whether the train-the-trainer program is delivering the desired results. Look beyond participant satisfaction.

For example, assess:

• whether the trainers have mastered the necessary skills;
• whether training sessions are conducted consistently;
• whether the participants ultimately achieve the learning objectives;
• whether what is learned is applied in the workplace;
• whether the material is still up-to-date and useful;
• what support trainers need afterward.

Use these insights to further improve the program, the training materials, and the guidance.

An effective train the trainer program is therefore not a one-time course. It is an ongoing process of learning, practicing, receiving feedback, applying what you’ve learned, and improving.

Real-world example of a train-the-trainer program

The train the trainer principle is often used when an organization wants to train a large number of people in the same way within a short period of time. Examples include the implementation of a new software system, a revised work method, or new safety guidelines.

In the fictional example below, a medium-sized organization is implementing a new customer registration system. Approximately 250 employees need to learn how to correctly enter, update, and verify customer data. A single external trainer cannot train all employees in person. Therefore, the organization opts for a train the trainer program.

The Reason

The organization operates from five different locations. Each location uses the existing system in a slightly different way. This results in discrepancies in the registration of customer data.

With the new system, the organization aims to implement a single, standardized procedure. Employees must not only understand how the system works; they must also know which guidelines apply and why they are important.

The organization is therefore selecting ten internal trainers. They will later train the employees at their own locations.

Selecting the Internal Trainers

The selection process looks beyond technical knowledge. Future trainers must also be able to communicate clearly, be patient, and be open to feedback.

The selected employees possess:

• experience with daily work processes;
• sufficient knowledge of the target audience;
• interest in learning and professional development;
• the ability to explain information clearly;
• sufficient time to prepare and deliver training sessions.

Not all participants have spoken in front of a group before. That’s not a problem. The train-the-trainer program is specifically designed to help participants further develop these skills.

Preparing the program

The external trainer works with the project leader and several subject matter experts to develop a single, comprehensive training program. This program covers the most important system procedures, work agreements, and real-world scenarios.

Every internal trainer receives the same basic package:

• a training script;
• a presentation containing the key explanations;
• hands-on assignments;
• a list of frequently asked questions;
• an observation and evaluation form.

The central materials ensure consistency. At the same time, trainers are given the flexibility to use examples that are relevant to their own location.

Demonstration and practice

During the first session, the external trainer conducts a sample training session. The internal trainers first take on the role of participants.

Afterward, they discuss the following together:

• how the training session was opened;
• how the explanation was structured;
• what questions were asked;
• how participants were engaged;
• how understanding was assessed;
• how errors and resistance were handled.

Next, each internal trainer conducts a short practice session. The other participants play the roles of employees with varying levels of experience. For example, one participant asks many critical questions, while another struggles with digital systems.

This allows the trainers to practice not only the planned content but also situations that might arise during an actual training session.

Feedback and Evaluation

After each practice session, the trainer receives feedback from the group and from the external trainer. The feedback is provided based on established criteria.

Among other things, the following are evaluated:

• the structure of the explanation;
• the accuracy of the information;
• interaction with the group;
• the use of real-world examples;
• the chosen teaching methods;
• handling questions;
• assessment of learning outcomes.

Some trainers are good at explaining the system procedures but don’t give participants enough time to practice on their own. Other trainers use many examples but, as a result, lose track of the schedule.

Based on this feedback, each trainer adapts their own practice session and conducts it again.

The first training sessions on the job

After the train the trainer program, the internal trainers conduct the first sessions at their own locations. An experienced trainer or project leader observes some of these sessions.

During this first round, it becomes clear that employees mainly have questions about exceptional situations. These situations were not sufficiently covered in the original training materials.

The in-house trainers collect the questions and discuss them with the project team. The script and practical exercises are then updated. All trainers also receive an updated list of answers and examples.

This not only improves the individual trainers but also enhances the central training program.

Evaluation and Quality Assurance

After the first round of training, the organization looks beyond participant satisfaction. It also examines whether employees are using the system correctly.

For example, the organization checks:

• whether customer data is entered in the agreed-upon manner;
• which errors still occur regularly;
• whether employees can perform the most important tasks independently;
• whether all locations use the same procedures;
• what additional support is needed.

The internal trainers meet again after a few weeks. During this meeting, they share experiences, discuss recurring questions, and determine which parts of the training need to be adjusted.

What can we learn from this case study?

This real-world case study shows that “Train the Trainer” is more than just a one-time training session for a group of trainers. Its success also depends on the selection process, practice sessions, the quality of the materials, and follow-up support.

In addition, the in-house trainers play a key role in improving the program. They are closely involved in day-to-day operations and see firsthand which questions, mistakes, and learning needs actually arise.

A good “Train the Trainer” program therefore combines a solid foundation with room for feedback and improvement. This allows knowledge to be disseminated on a larger scale without losing sight of the quality of the training.

What are the advantages, disadvantages, and prerequisites of Train the Trainer?

The Train the Trainer principle makes it possible to disseminate knowledge and skills through internal trainers within an organization. This can save time and money and ensures that training sessions are better aligned with day-to-day practice.

However, success is not guaranteed. If trainers are not adequately prepared or supervised, the quality of the training may vary from group to group. That is why it is important to consider not only the advantages but also the disadvantages and prerequisites.

Benefits of Train the Trainer

Knowledge can be disseminated on a larger scale

An experienced trainer first trains a smaller group of internal trainers. These trainers can then train multiple groups within the organization.

As a result, not every employee needs to be trained directly by the same central trainer. This makes it possible to reach a larger target audience in a relatively short time.

In-house trainers understand the organization

Internal trainers often understand how the organization works. They are familiar with the systems used, the daily work processes, and the situations participants encounter.

As a result, they can link the theory to relatable examples. This makes the training more practical and helps participants apply the content to their own work more quickly.

The organization becomes less dependent on external trainers

When there are enough in-house trainers available, the organization does not need to hire an external trainer for every training session.

Moreover, the knowledge remains within the organization. New employees can be trained, and existing employees can take refresher courses when necessary.

The content can be better tailored to the target audience

In-house trainers are often familiar with their colleagues’ level of knowledge, questions, and learning needs. They can adapt their explanations, examples, and teaching methods accordingly.

For example, a trainer can devote extra attention to topics that regularly cause problems within a particular department.

Trainers continue to develop their skills

Participants in a Train the Trainer program not only develop their training skills. They also learn to take a more conscious look at their own professional knowledge and communication style.

By providing explanations, answering questions, and receiving feedback, they deepen their own knowledge. Skills such as presenting, active listening, coaching, and reflection are also further developed.

Opportunities for continuous improvement arise

During their training sessions, in-house trainers hear the questions participants ask and learn about the challenges they face in practice. This information can be used to further improve the training materials.

The Train the Trainer principle therefore contributes not only to knowledge transfer but also to updating work methods, instructions, and learning activities.

Disadvantages and risks of Train the Trainer

Quality may vary by trainer

Not every trainer explains the content in the same way. Differences in experience, preparation, and training style can result in participants not receiving the same quality of training across the board.

This risk increases when trainers are given a great deal of freedom but there is no clear core curriculum or set of quality criteria.

Knowledge may change during the transfer process

In a cascade model, information is passed on multiple times. As a result, details may be lost or interpreted differently.

For example, a trainer might simplify an explanation, causing important conditions or exceptions to be omitted. After multiple rounds of transmission, the content may therefore deviate from the original message.

A subject matter expert is not automatically a good trainer

Someone may have a great deal of knowledge and experience but struggle to convey that knowledge in an understandable way.

A good trainer must do more than just explain concepts. The trainer must also ask questions, engage participants, accommodate different learning levels, and verify that the content is actually understood.

Preparation takes time

A Train the Trainer program requires an investment before the first training sessions can begin.

Time is needed for:

• selecting suitable trainers;
• developing training materials;
• practicing training components;
• providing and processing feedback;
• evaluating the trainers;
• supervising the first practical sessions.

If this preparation is skipped, the likelihood of variations in quality increases.

In-house trainers do not always have enough time

In-house trainers often combine their training role with their regular job duties. As a result, training preparation can come under pressure.

If the organization does not allocate time for this, there is a risk that trainers will not prepare their sessions adequately or will eventually be unable to fulfill their training role.

Trainers may fall back into old habits

During a Train the Trainer program, participants learn new techniques and teaching methods. In practice, however, they may fall back on long presentations and one-sided knowledge transfer.

Without observation, peer review, or coaching, it is difficult to determine whether the approach they learned is still being applied over the long term.

The program may become too standardized

A fixed structure and standardized training materials help ensure quality. However, too much standardization can come at the expense of flexibility.

A trainer must be able to adapt to the participants’ level, questions, and experiences. The foundation must therefore be established, but there must also be room to tailor the training to the group.

Prerequisites for an Effective Train-the-Trainer Program

The benefits of Train the Trainer are best realized when the organization establishes clear criteria for the selection, training, and supervision of trainers.

Select trainers carefully

Do not select participants based solely on subject-matter expertise. Also consider motivation, communication skills, learning ability, and a willingness to receive feedback.

A future trainer does not yet need to master all training skills. However, there must be sufficient interest and potential for development.

Work with clear learning objectives

Describe in advance what the trainers should know and be able to do by the end of the program. Also make it clear what results the final participants are expected to achieve.

These learning objectives provide direction for the program, the exercises, and the assessment.

Ensure a consistent foundation of content

Use a central script, consistent core messages, and up-to-date training materials. This prevents trainers from conveying conflicting information.

Also specify which components are mandatory and where trainers have the flexibility to add their own examples or teaching methods.

Give trainers ample opportunity to practice

Training skills aren’t developed solely by studying theory. Participants must prepare and conduct training components themselves.

Provide multiple opportunities for practice. Have trainers practice again after receiving feedback so they can immediately apply improvements.

Use standardized assessment criteria

Evaluate trainers based on predetermined criteria. Consider, for example, the structure of the training, the clarity of the explanations, interaction with the group, and the assessment of learning outcomes.

Fixed criteria make the evaluation more transparent and help maintain a consistent level of quality.

Supervise the first training sessions

The first training sessions in a real-world setting are an important part of the learning process. Have an experienced trainer, instructor, or project leader observe and provide targeted feedback.

This allows problems to be identified early on, so an internal trainer does not have to resolve them on their own.

Provide trainers with time and support

Establish clear guidelines regarding the time trainers are allowed to spend on preparation, delivery, and evaluation.

Also, provide a designated point of contact where trainers can turn to with questions about content, challenging situations, or requests for additional support.

Organize peer review and knowledge sharing

Have trainers regularly discuss their experiences, questions, and real-world examples with one another. This allows them to learn not only from their own training sessions but also from the experiences of others.

Intervision also helps highlight differences among trainers and develop solutions collaboratively.

Keep the training materials up to date

Appoint someone to be responsible for managing and updating the central training materials.

New insights, updated methods, and recurring questions should be incorporated into a single central location. This ensures that all trainers continue to work with the same up-to-date information.

Evaluate beyond satisfaction

A positive evaluation immediately after the training does not necessarily mean that participants can actually apply what they’ve learned.

Therefore, also assess:

• whether the trainers are using the agreed-upon approach;
• whether participants are achieving the learning objectives;
• whether the knowledge is applied in the workplace;
• whether errors or quality variations are decreasing;
• what additional guidance is needed.

The Right Balance Between Standardization and Customization

An effective Train the Trainer program operates on a recognizable and consistent foundation. At the same time, trainers need the flexibility to adapt their explanations and teaching methods to the participants.

Too little structure leads to variations in quality. Too much structure can result in a training program that no longer aligns with real-world practice.

The strength of Train the Trainer therefore lies in the combination of clear quality standards, well-prepared trainers, and the flexibility to adapt to the target audience. When guidance, evaluation, and updates are also in place, this approach can contribute to sustainable knowledge transfer within the organization.

More information

Recommended books and publications on Train the Trainer

Train the Trainer helps organizations better prepare internal trainers, instructors, and subject matter experts to deliver effective training sessions. The approach focuses not only on knowledge transfer, but also on teaching methods, adult education, learning objectives, instructional strategies, feedback, group facilitation, and ensuring transfer to real-world practice. The books and publications listed below provide additional insight into Train the Trainer, instructional design, adult learning, training transfer, trainer development, and the design and facilitation of learning processes.

1. Dirksen, J. (2016). Design for How People Learn. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. → Dirksen explains in an accessible way how people learn and how training programs can be designed accordingly. This book is relevant to Train the Trainer programs because trainers must not only master the content but also understand how participants process, practice, and apply information.
2. Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The Transfer of Training: What Really Matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103–120. → Grossman and Salas identify the factors that determine whether training is actually applied in the workplace. This aligns well with Train the Trainer, because a trainer must not only facilitate a session but also consider application, support, feedback, and the work environment.
3. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. London, England: Routledge. → This book is an important foundational resource for adult education and andragogy. It is relevant to Train the Trainer because adult participants often learn in a practice-oriented way, bring their own experiences to the table, and have a need for autonomy, relevance, and immediate applicability.
4. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101. → This publication provides a broad scientific foundation for training and development in organizations. The source is valuable for Train the Trainer because it demonstrates that effective training requires analysis, design, implementation, practice, feedback, and evaluation.
5. Silberman, M. L., & Biech, E. (2015). Active Training: A Handbook of Techniques, Designs, Case Examples, and Tips. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. → Silberman and Biech focus on active learning methods and participant engagement. This book aligns well with Train the Trainer, as it teaches trainers how to encourage participants not only to listen but also to actively practice, reflect, collaborate, and apply what they’ve learned.
6. Sitzmann, T., & Weinhardt, J. M. (2018). Training engagement theory: A multilevel perspective on the effectiveness of work-related training. Journal of Management, 44(2), 732–756. → Sitzmann and Weinhardt demonstrate that training engagement arises at multiple levels. This is relevant to Train the Trainer because trainers influence motivation, attention, the learning environment, interaction, and the way participants take ownership of their learning process.
7. Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and Development in Work Organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 399-441. → Tannenbaum and Yukl provide an overview of research on training and development in organizations. This publication is useful for Train the Trainer programs because it makes clear that effective training begins with needs analysis and ends with implementation, evaluation, and continuous improvement.
8. Taylor, K., & Marienau, C. (2016). Facilitating Learning with the Adult Brain in Mind: A Conceptual and Practical Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. → Taylor and Marienau link adult learning to insights about the brain. The book is relevant to Train the Trainer because it helps trainers better understand how attention, emotion, experience, safety, and interaction influence learning.
9. Wisshak, S., Hochholdinger, S., & Keller, M. (2025). Train-the-Trainer: A generic offer-and-use model for the development of trainers. International Journal of Training and Development. → This recent publication focuses specifically on Train-the-Trainer programs. The article is relevant because it offers a theoretical model for the development of trainers and addresses learning processes, motivation, transfer, and the quality of training offerings.
10. Wlodkowski, R. J., & Ginsberg, M. B. (2017). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. → Wlodkowski and Ginsberg demonstrate how motivation among adult learners can be enhanced. This aligns well with Train the Trainer, as trainers must be able to work with diverse learning needs, backgrounds, expectations, and levels of engagement.

How to cite this article:
Sari, J. (2018). Train the Trainer. Retrieved [insert date] from Toolshero.com: https://www.toolshero.com/management/train-the-trainer/

Original publication date: December 14, 2018 | Last update: July 20, 2026

Add a link to this page on your website:

<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/management/train-the-trainer/”>Toolshero.com: Train the Trainer</a>

Tagged: Coaching Working Methods