Losada Line Model explained
Losada Line Model: this article explains the Losada Line Model, also known as the Critical Positivity Patio in a practical way. After reading you will understand the basics of this powerful learning tool.
What is the Losada Line Model?
What makes different teams function in different ways within an organization? The Chilean psychologist Marcial Losada carried out a study into this phenomenon.
As the founder of Meta Learning, he developed an approach to study the functioning of teams. This Losada Line Model is also known as the positivity ratio and the Gottman ratio.
Criteria Positivity ratio
In his study, Marcial Losada distinguished high-performance, medium-performance and low-performance teams, in which he defined performance based on three criteria: profitability, customer satisfaction ratings and 360 degree feedback ratings.
Furthermore, the study showed that the degree of performance is connected with the degree of positivity and negativity within the teams.
Positivity ratio: Losada Line Model
The study resulted in the Losada line (Losada ratio), in which the positivity-negativity ratio is indicated by numbers. The minimum ratio of 2.9 indicates negativity and the upper ratio of approximately 11.6 indicates positivity. The model therefore makes a selection in the complex dynamics within human interaction.
People who have a positive outlook on life, will find themselves on the upper limit and people who have a negative outlook on life, will find themselves on the lower limit.
The model is calculated according to a non-linear system in which the variables do not have an identical value measurement and weighing scale.
Furthermore, the total scores of the different valuables are not added, but the influence that the valuables have on each other is considered. It could happen that the variable ‘happiness’ increases exponentially because of the variable ‘gratitude’. According to Losada human emotions are incredibly powerful and they can build on themselves. This is why it is necessary to calculate positivity and negativity by using a non-linear system.
Losada’s research revealed a number of findings. A balanced team that works closely together and is capable of complex situations, finds itself at the upper line of the Losada Line Model. These are the so-called ´high performance teams´.
These types of teams are strongly internally and externally oriented and they are very creative and flexible. A less well-balanced team which, as a result, is less capable of jointly arriving at solutions, will find itself at the lower side of the Losada Line Model.
These are the so-called low performance teams that are highly internally oriented. In between there are the medium performance teams, that are not (yet) capable to escape the daily routines and they are therefore more internally oriented.
Losada Line Model and human interactions
The upper and lower limits of the Losada line model determine the preconditions for the complex dynamics in human interactions.
These dynamics can be subdivided into fixed point attractors and chaotic attractors. The chaotic attractors are characteristic of flexibility, innovation and creativity.
A team that is predominantly outward focused and which therefore finds itself at the upper limit of the Losada line, will perform much better than internally oriented teams.
Conclusion of the Losada Line Model
Positivity and negativity are strong feedback processes in human behaviour, and these apply to both the individual and the team. Positive feedback motivates a team to continue and look for (joint) solutions.
The Losada line is a critical parameter to determine which dynamics are possible within a team. By repeatedly comparing positive feedback with negative feedback, the degree of positivity and negativity become measurable. The more positive a team is, the more willing the team members will be to work together in a solution-oriented manner.
Positivity has a motivating influence on all team members as a result of which they are willing and able to perform optimally and encourage one another.
It’s Your Turn
What do you think? Are you familiar with the Losada Line Model or Positivity ratio? Do you recognize the practical explanation or do you have more suggestions? What are your success factors for the good team performance management?
Share your experience and knowledge in the comments box below.
- Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678.
- Losada, M. (2008). Work teams and the Losada line: New results. Positive Psychology News Daily, 9.
- Losada, M. & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47 (6), pp. 740–765.
- Losadaline Consulting (2012). What is the Losada Line? What is Meta Learning? Interview with Dr. Marcial Losada. Positive Business Forum. Milan, Italy, March 27-28. Retrieved 20/10/2014 from https://www.losadalineconsulting.net/.
How to cite this article:
Mulder, P. (2013). Losada Line Model. Retrieved [insert date] from Toolshero: https://www.toolshero.com/personal-development/losada-line-model/
Original publication date: 03/09/2013 | Last update: 05/20/2023
Add a link to this page on your website:
<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/personal-development/losada-line-model/”>Toolshero: Losada Line Model</a>
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?
2 responses to “Losada Line Model explained”
This theory, at least the so-called critical ratio of 2.9, has been convincingly refuted as nonsense, cf. Brown, N. J., Sokal, A. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2013). “The Complex Dynamics of Wishful Thinking: The Critical Positivity Ratio”.
And even the author Fredrickson admitted this: “I’ve come to see sufficient reason to question the particular mathematical framework Losada and I adopted.” (Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Updated Thinking on Positivity Ratios).
Strangely enough, such esoteric theories are always welcome in the field of coaching, but nobody takes note of the scientific publication.
Thank you for your comment, Volker.