Bowlby and Ainsworth’s attachment styles: the Basics and Test

Bowlby and Ainsworth’s attachment styles - Toolshero.com

Attachment styles explain why you sometimes feel a natural connection in relationships, yet at other times find yourself falling into the same pattern. It often isn’t a matter of “willpower,” but rather what you unconsciously expect from yourself and others. This begins with your internal working model: a mental blueprint shaped by early experiences of closeness, comfort, and reliability. Once you understand which pattern is most active in you, behavior suddenly makes sense. And that creates space to consciously choose differently.

In this article, you’ll discover how Bowlby’s Attachment theory and Ainsworth’s research laid the foundation, and why it’s important to distinguish between attachment observations in children and attachment models in adults. You’ll get a clear explanation of the four attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganized), including characteristics and recognizable examples. You’ll also read about common misconceptions and practical tips for better managing different styles. In addition, you can download the attachment styles model in high resolution and use a downloadable attachment styles test to get a first impression of your dominant style. Enjoy reading!

What is attachment in psychology?

In very simple terms, attachment is the way people form emotional bonds with significant others in their lives. This bond often develops in the first years of life and subconsciously influences how we form relationships later on.

Attachment is generally viewed as both a biological and psychological system. The biological aspect is often focused on protection and survival, while from a psychological perspective, it forms the foundation for how we experience relationships later in life.

Security is at the core of attachment. When a child feels that their needs are taken seriously, a sense of basic trust develops. If, on the other hand, these signals are regularly ignored or met with inconsistent responses, insecurity can arise.

Origins of Attachment Styles: John Bowlby’s Theory

To understand what attachment styles are and what this means exactly, it is helpful to go back to the mid-twentieth century. During this period, John Bowlby laid the foundation for what would later become attachment theory. He is therefore regarded as the founder of this theoretical framework.

In his work with socially and emotionally vulnerable young people, Bowlby observed how significant the impact can be of an early separation, absence, or insecure bond with the mother or another primary caregiver. He concluded that a child’s first relationship is not only important for that moment but also shapes later psychological, emotional, and social development. In doing so, he made it clear that attachment is not a side issue but a fundamental part of healthy development.

In doing so, Bowlby laid the foundation for a theory that brings together biology, evolution, and psychology. Children naturally seek closeness with a trusted caregiver, especially during moments of stress, fear, or uncertainty. That caregiver serves as a safe haven for comfort and protection, but also as a secure base from which a child dares to explore the world step by step. It is precisely this combination that makes attachment so important for trust, independence, and emotional regulation.

Yet Bowlby is only part of the story. The theory gained additional depth through the work of Mary Ainsworth. She played a much greater role in the further development of attachment theory than is often acknowledged. While Bowlby primarily laid the theoretical foundation, Ainsworth made the theory concrete, observable, and more testable in research and practice.

Using her well-known psychological procedure Strange Situation, Ainsworth observed how young children react to separation and reunion with their caregiver. This revealed that children do not all react in the same way to closeness, distance, and comfort. As a result, differences between secure and insecure attachment could be better identified and described.

It is therefore more appropriate to view Bowlby as the founder of attachment theory, while Ainsworth is the researcher who further developed, refined, and made this theory practically measurable. Together, they form the basis of what we know today about attachment styles and their influence on behavior, relationships, and development.

Theory Behind Attachment Styles

But why do two people react completely differently to the same situation in a relationship? The answer lies in what Bowlby calls “internal working models.” This refers to certain unconscious beliefs we develop as children about ourselves and others.

An internal working model can be seen, as it were, as a mental blueprint of a person. As a child, you learn—often through repeated experiences—what to expect from others. Do your caregivers respond empathetically and predictably? Then you develop a model where relationships feel safe. Are the responses, on the other hand, inconsistent or negative? Then, logically, you develop a different pattern.

As a child, you develop all of this into an attachment schema that leads to a stable pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting in relationships. Understanding this makes it clear that behavior in relationships is rarely random.

The theory makes it clear that attachment styles are not random. By gaining insight into your own internal working models, it becomes clear why certain patterns keep repeating and how you can consciously influence them.

Attachment Styles in Children and Adults

The origins of attachment styles lie in Bowlby’s attachment theory and Ainsworth’s observational research on young children. Later, this foundation was further developed into attachment models for adults. This is precisely why it is important to distinguish between the two levels.

In young children, the focus is primarily on observable attachment behavior in relation to a caregiver. In adults, the focus shifts to how early experiences influence self-image, expectations of others, and behavior in close relationships. Bowlby’s internal working models play a key role here. By this, he meant that early experiences with availability, safety, and comfort can develop into internal patterns that later influence trust, closeness, distance, and emotional regulation.

Based on this idea, models of adult attachment were later developed. These models focus not only on the relationship with the parent, but especially on how a person navigates romantic relationships, friendships, and other social interactions. The well-known axis model, which involves a positive or negative view of oneself and of others, is also part of this later development.

This distinction is important because it prevents childlike attachment observations and adult relationship patterns from being viewed as exactly the same. They are clearly interrelated, but they represent different layers within the same theory. This also makes it clearer how attachment styles can influence relationships, collaboration, and personal development.

Four Attachment Styles Explained

According to the standard classification, there are four different attachment styles: one secure and three insecure variants. Below, you’ll find the characteristics, relationship behaviors, typical thoughts, and a relatable example for each attachment style, so you can easily identify which attachment style you or someone else exhibits.

The four attachment styles are often represented in a simple model with two axes: the image someone has of themselves and the image someone has of others. These two dimensions determine how secure or insecure someone feels in relationships.

Four Attachment Styles Model (Bowlby & Ainsworth) - Toolshero.com

Figure 1 – Four Attachment Styles Model

Download

Download the Four Attachment Styles Model in high resolution

This high resolution image is exclusively for our paying Toolshero members. Click here to see if a membership is something for you!

Attachment Style: Securely Attached

With a secure attachment style, there is a fundamental trust in yourself and in the other person. Someone with this style has often learned that closeness is safe and that support is available when needed. As a result, it is usually easier to express feelings, ask for help, and remain independent at the same time.

Behavior in relationships

In relationships, this often leads to greater openness, reciprocity, and emotional stability. In practice, this doesn’t mean there’s never any tension or uncertainty, but it does mean that such tension can usually be better managed. This can also be evident at work. Think of someone who can receive feedback without immediately becoming defensive, or who collaborates based on trust rather than control.

Typical thoughts

Typical thoughts for people with a secure attachment style are: “relationships are safe” or “my partner is there for me”.

Example situation:
In the event of a disagreement, this person actively seeks a solution rather than withdrawing or allowing the situation to escalate further.

Attachment style: Anxious (preoccupied)

With an ambivalent or anxious attachment style, there is often a strong need for closeness, combined with uncertainty about the other person’s availability. Someone wants connection, but at the same time doubts whether that connection is safe or stable. As a result, they may become highly sensitive to signs of distance, rejection, or change.

Behavior in relationships

This pattern can manifest as worrying, seeking reassurance, feeling anxious quickly, or having difficulty letting go. In relationships, this can create intensity, but also tension. A person may be strongly focused on connection, while simultaneously fearing abandonment. In work relationships, this may be evident in sensitivity to criticism, a need for recognition, or tension when expectations are unclear.

Typical thoughts

Typical thoughts for people with an anxious attachment style include: “I need to try harder” or “What if he/she doesn’t like me anymore?”.

Example scenario:
A very good example is when a partner doesn’t respond to a message for a few hours. People with an anxious attachment style may interpret this as a sign of rejection, leading to anxiety or sending another message.

Attachment Style: Avoidant (Dismissive)

With an avoidant attachment style, the emphasis is often on independence, distance, and emotional reserve. Someone with this style has often learned that closeness is not automatically safe or available. As a result, there may be a tendency to show fewer emotions, prefer to solve problems alone, and avoid dependence.

Behavior in relationships

On the surface, this may come across as strong, calm, or independent. At the same time, there may be an inner struggle with vulnerability, connection, or allowing support. In relationships, this can lead to distance, holding back emotions, or avoiding depth. In a professional setting, this may manifest as difficulty with open feedback, delegating, or discussing personal boundaries.

Typical thoughts

“I’ll manage on my own” is a typical thought for people with this attachment style.

Example situation:
When the relationship becomes more serious, this person may emotionally withdraw or create distance.

Attachment Style: Fear (disorganized)

With a disorganized attachment style, the need for closeness and fear are often strongly intertwined. While someone may long for security and connection, they sometimes also experience that same connection as stressful, confusing, or unpredictable. This can lead to conflicting reactions. One moment there is a need for contact, while the next moment distance is sought.

Behavior in relationships

This style is often seen as more complex because there doesn’t seem to be a clear, fixed strategy for dealing with anxiety or attachment. This can manifest in inconsistent behavior, emotional turmoil, or difficulty perceiving relationships as safe and stable. This can also have an impact on collaboration or leadership. Consider difficulties with trust, unpredictable reactions to closeness or control, or tension in situations where dependency plays a role.

Typical thoughts

These people often believe that relationships are both safe and dangerous.

Example situation:
After an argument, someone wants both comfort and distance at the same time, which can be confusing for both partners.

Additional notes on the model

When someone develops a positive view of themselves and of others, a secure attachment style usually emerges. People with this pattern experience relationships as reliable and feel both independent and connected to others.

When the self-image is more negative, but trust in others remains relatively high, an anxious attachment style may develop. In that case, a person strongly seeks validation and closeness.
Conversely, when someone has a positive self-image but little trust in others, an avoidant attachment style is more likely to develop. The emphasis is then on independence and emotional distance.

Finally, a disorganized attachment style develops when both self-image and trust in others are unstable. This creates an inner conflict between a desire for connection and a fear of closeness.

Attachment Styles in Adult Relationships

Attachment styles do not disappear in adulthood. They continue to influence how people deal with intimacy, trust, conflict, and emotional distance. What once started as an early strategy for seeking safety often becomes visible later in romantic relationships, close friendships, and other meaningful connections.

This means that adult relationships are not only shaped by personality or communication skills. They are also influenced by deeper expectations about availability, rejection, closeness, and emotional safety. Someone with a secure attachment style often finds it easier to trust, stay emotionally connected, and discuss tension without immediately feeling overwhelmed. Someone with an anxious attachment style may seek reassurance more quickly and become more alert when the other person seems distant. An avoidant pattern often shows up in the opposite direction. In that case, someone may need more distance, downplay emotions, or pull back when a relationship becomes more intense.

One of the most recognizable dynamics in adult relationships is the anxious avoidant pattern. This often creates a difficult cycle. One partner seeks closeness and confirmation, while the other withdraws to protect space and independence. The more one pushes for connection, the more the other may step back. As a result, both partners can feel misunderstood, even when neither is intentionally trying to harm the relationship.

A secure attachment style usually brings more stability to this process. That does not mean conflict disappears. It means that tension can be addressed with more openness, clearer communication, and a stronger sense that the relationship can handle discomfort. This often creates more room for trust, repair, and emotional growth.

Understanding attachment styles in adult relationships helps explain why certain patterns keep repeating. It also makes clear that these patterns are not fixed personality labels. They are learned ways of responding to closeness and uncertainty. Once that becomes visible, it becomes easier to respond with more awareness and build healthier, more balanced relationships.

Common Misconceptions About Attachment Styles

There are quite a few misconceptions surrounding attachment style theory. We address the three most commonly cited misconceptions below:

You can only have one attachment style in your life

People often think that you always fit into exactly one of the four categories, whereas in reality, attachment styles exist on a spectrum, as shown in the image above.

You may react differently in romantic relationships than you do in friendships or at work. Behavior is often context-dependent.

It’s always down to your parents and upbringing

Yes, parents play an important role, but attachment is certainly also influenced by temperament, later experiences and relationships, or significant life events. In addition to parents, other caregivers also play a role.

Insecure attachment means you are damaged

Being insecurely attached does not mean you are ‘broken’ or permanently damaged. These are defense mechanisms that once made sense. What helped in the past may now be less helpful in intimate relationships.

Practical tips: dealing with different attachment styles

Dealing with different attachment styles requires awareness and practice. Those who gain insight into their own patterns often discover that reactions in relationships are predictable. The challenge lies in breaking through automatic reactions. This starts with slowing down: feeling what is happening, identifying what you need, and communicating this openly. In this way, a greater sense of inner security develops step by step.

For parents, it is important to provide a safe haven where emotions are welcome. Children learn security when their feelings are acknowledged. Finally, professionals build change by first creating a trustworthy working relationship. Because regardless of age or context, security remains at the core of every attachment style.

Attachment Styles as a Compass for Relationships

The core of the theory is that attachment styles form the invisible foundation of our relationships. Among other things, they influence how a person builds trust, how conflicts are handled, and how we respond to distance and closeness.

Insight is the key to changing or improving your attachment style. When you realize that patterns have emerged from past experiences, your perspective shifts. In this way, the notion that “this is just who I am” turns out to be a learned pattern that can evolve through change, giving you greater control.

In daily life, this means you communicate more mindfully, recognize your needs more quickly, and better understand what motivates others. Attachment styles are therefore not a label, but a tool—a compass that helps you navigate relationships with greater security, connection, and trust.

Attachment Styles Test

Attachment styles often only become truly clear when you link them to your own experiences. That’s why a short self-assessment test can be a valuable addition to this article. You’ll not only learn what secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganized attachment mean, but you’ll also more quickly recognize which patterns are familiar in your own relationships, communication, and behavior.

That is precisely where the added value lies. The test helps you reflect on questions such as: how do you react to distance, how easily do you trust others, and what happens when tension or uncertainty rises? This makes the theory more concrete and easier to apply in daily life. As a result, you gain more control over recurring reactions, and space is created to approach relationships and connection more consciously.

The result of this test is not a diagnosis, but rather a practical starting point for reflection and development. This can help you better understand behavior, recognize patterns sooner, and work more effectively toward greater peace of mind, trust, and emotional security. That is precisely why this download is valuable for anyone who wants to apply the content of this article to personal or professional growth.

Want to get started right away? Download the Attachment Styles Test and discover which attachment style is most recognizable to you right now, including an explanation of your score, details for each result, and suggestions for further exploration.

Download

Download the Attachment Styles Test

For members only | Get instant access to the Attachment Styles Test plus unlimited access to 1,200+ expert articles and tools. Explore Membership Options

Frequently asked questions about attachment styles

Can you have different attachment styles in different relationships?

Yes. Attachment patterns can show up differently depending on the relationship and the level of emotional safety someone experiences. A person may feel relatively secure in friendships, yet become more anxious or avoidant in romantic relationships. That is because attachment patterns are influenced by context, triggers, and earlier experiences, rather than functioning as one fixed label in every situation.

Is an attachment style test a diagnosis?

No. An attachment style test is not a clinical diagnosis. It is better understood as a practical starting point for reflection. The result can help someone recognize recurring patterns in trust, closeness, and emotional reactions, but it should not be seen as a final judgment or permanent label.

How can someone move toward a more secure attachment style?

Moving toward a more secure attachment style usually starts with awareness. Once people begin to recognize their recurring patterns in thoughts, emotions, and behavior, they create room to respond differently. In practice, this often involves noticing triggers earlier, communicating needs more clearly, and building relationships in which safety, consistency, and trust can grow over time.

Join the Toolshero community

Recommended books and articles on attachment styles

Attachment styles help us better understand behavior, relationships, and emotional reactions based on early experiences and later patterns. These books provide a solid foundation for Bowlby’s attachment theory and demonstrate how secure and insecure attachment develop, while the articles offer deeper insights into attachment patterns, adult relationships, and emotion regulation. This gives you a clear framework to better understand attachment styles and apply them purposefully in psychology, coaching, and personal development.

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49–67. → This article demonstrates how attachment manifests in behavior and forms an important empirical basis for later attachment styles.
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. → This book describes the famous Strange Situation study and explains how different attachment patterns manifest in children.
  3. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. London, UK: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. → This book forms the classic foundation of attachment theory and demonstrates why early relationships have such a strong influence on development and behavior.
  4. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. London, UK: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. → This book explores what happens when attachment is under stress and helps to better understand anxiety, protest, and emotional reactions.
  5. Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154. → This article provides a clear overview of adult attachment and shows how the classical model has evolved.
  6. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. → This article is a classic because it demonstrates how attachment patterns also manifest in romantic relationships.
  7. Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/ disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M. T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the Preschool Years (pp. 121–160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. → This article introduces the disorganized attachment style and helps to better understand more complex attachment patterns.
  8. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. → This book demonstrates how attachment styles influence adult relationships, stress regulation, and self-concept, thereby offering a modern expansion on Bowlby’s work.
  9. Simpson, J. A., Collins, W. A., Tran, S., & Haydon, K. C. (2007). Attachment and the Experience and Expression of Emotions in Romantic Relationships: A Developmental Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 355–367. → This article demonstrates how attachment style influences emotions, conflict, and intimacy in adult relationships.
  10. Wallin, D. J. (2007). Attachment in Psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press. → This book bridges the gap between attachment theory and practice and demonstrates how attachment patterns become recognizable in counseling and therapy.

How to cite this article:
Weijers, L. (2025). Attachment Styles. Retrieved [insert date] from Toolshero.com: https://www.toolshero.com/psychology/attachment-styles/

Original publication date: March 18, 2026 | Last update: April 7, 2026

Add a link to this page on your website:
<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/psychology/attachment-styles/”>Toolshero.com: Attachment Styles</a>

Did you find this article interesting?

Your rating is more than welcome or share this article via Social media!

Average rating 4.1 / 5. Vote count: 7

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Lars Weijers
Article by:

Lars Weijers

Lars Weijers is an experienced copywriter with an extensive marketing communications background. His specialisms lie in creative and active writing, combined with good search engine findability. Lars also works as an event and account manager with a commercial focus.

Tagged:

Leave a Reply