Metacognition

Metacognition - toolshero

This article explains Metacognition in a practical way. After reading, you’ll understand the basics of this powerful psychological tool.

What is Metacognition? The definition

Metacognition is ‘thinking about thinking’, ‘knowing about knowing’ and ‘becoming aware of awareness’. The term metacognition comes from the root word meta, which means further or on top of. Metacognition takes many forms and includes knowledge about when and how certain strategies can be used to solve problems or to learn. In general, metacognition involves two components: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition.

Metacognition as a concept was first introduced by John Flavell. He is seen as the founder of this field. Flavell stated that metacognition is the knowledge people have about their own cognitive processes.

Flavell shares an example: “I engage in metacognition when I have more difficulty learning A than B and when I have to check C again before accepting it as fact”. Metacognition is therefore the ability to control thought processes by using various strategies. Examples of these strategies are organising, monitoring and adjusting.

In addition, metacognition is the ability to think about tasks, processes and conditions that are required in intercultural interactions.

Metacognition is considered an essential part of learning successfully. It is directly linked to the self-regulation and self-reflection of strengths and weaknesses and the strategies a person devises to achieve a goal. Metacognition is the foundation of culturally intelligent leadership because it underscores how someone thinks about a problem or situation and what strategies he or she will use to tackle the problem.

Elements of metacognitive knowledge

As described, Flavell distinguishes between metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Metacognitive knowledge refers to what individuals know about their own cognitive processes, about different approaches that can be used for problem solving, and about the requirements and conditions for successfully completing a task.

Metacognitive regulation mainly refers to the adjustments that individuals make in their cognitive processes to help manage and improve their learning. Examples include plans, information management, evaluation of progress and goals, etc. Metacognitive knowledge is further divided into three categories.

1. Person variables

A person variable is what someone knows about his or her strengths and weaknesses in learning and processing information.

2. Strategy variables

Strategy variables are the strategies that a person is always ready to apply in various ways to accomplish a task. Examples include activating prior knowledge before studying a technical article, using a glossary to look up unfamiliar words, or realising that a paragraph has to be read multiple times to be understood.

3. Task variables

Task variables are everything someone knows about the nature of a particular task and the requirements to perform the task. An example of this is the knowledge that reading an academic article takes more effort to understand and remember than any passage from a novel.

Livingston gave his own definition of metacognitive knowledge in 1997 by describing these variables: ‘I know that I (person variable) have trouble with word problems (task variable), so I will answer the math problems first and save the language problems for last.

Elements of metacognitive regulation

Like metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive regulation also includes some conditions or skills that are essential.

Planning

Planning refers to the selection of strategies and allocation of resources that influence the task performance. Selecting good strategies and proper allocation of resources is a sign of accurate planning in the metacognitive regulation process.

Monitoring

Monitoring refers to an individual’s awareness of understanding and task performance.

Evaluate

Evaluation refers to assessing the end product of a particular task. The efficiency with which the task has been performed is also assessed.

Metacognitive strategies

Below are some effective strategies for advancing metacognitions.

Self-questioning

Self-questioning is the evaluation process that students and others can use in which they ask themselves effective questions before, during and after learning to test their understanding of what is learned. Encouraging students to do this can be an effective way to expand their understanding of the subject. This metacognitive strategy has been extensively tried and tested.

One of the studies investigated whether self-questioning affected exactly how much the students could learn in a period. Several groups were created. The first group asked themselves these questions during the lecture. Students in the next group asked themselves questions during the lecture and had a Q&A session with each other afterwards. The third group of students discussed the content of the lecture in a small group, and the students from the last group of students assessed the material individually.

The researchers found that the students in the first two groups performed better than the students in the last two groups.

Thinking out loud

  • Thinking aloud helps control people’s thinking ability while reading.
  • Improves understanding of what is being considered.
  • Thinking aloud slows down the reading process and as a result people are forced to follow the text with focus.

Visualisations

Another strategy for improving metacognitions is to use graphic organisers. These are also called cognitive tools. Visualisations actively help to improve the human thinking process. Visualisations help individuals:

  • Ordering thoughts
  • Making connections between things they know
  • The visualisation of processes and procedures

There are many forms of visualisation to support the human thought process. Examples are:

Metacognition and Learning styles

Theories of learning styles such as the Gardner Multiple Intelligence Theory suggest that different people learn in different ways. It is therefore crucial to know which strategy works best for someone. Common learning styles are:

Visual

A visual learner learns optimally through graphs, images, documentaries and other visualisations. This group of people is very good at identifying patterns and matching colours.

Auditory

An auditory pupil learns optimally by listening instead of watching or reading. They enjoy hearing stories and listening to podcasts.

Kinaesthetic

A kinaesthetic student learns optimally through movement. This group of people like to learn by doing things instead of reading or listening. They are active rather than passive people.

Logical-mathematical

People who learn logical mathematics are good at using reasoning to find answers to difficult questions. They are generally good with numbers, but sometimes have difficulty with subjective issues.

Interpersonal

An interpersonal learner learns best through social interaction. They are good at group work, have high emotional intelligence, and are good at compromising to get the job done.

Intrapersonal

An intra-personal learner is someone who likes to learn things through pondering. They prefer to be alone and in isolation to learn and experience cooperation as a distraction.

Someone who is aware of the way his or her brain most comfortably processes information can work on personal strengths and weaknesses.

Examples of Metacognition

Metacognition thus plays a crucial role in learning new things. A place where many new things are learned is a school. Below is an explanation of metacognition by means of an example of a student.

1. The ability to critically think about your own thoughts

Often individuals are reluctant to admit that they are wrong in any way. However, taking a step back and assessing your own thoughts and mistakes plays a key role in becoming an independent and successful learner. When Student X is having trouble with certain math problems, he or she should consider whether their thought process for solving the problem is a good way of thinking.

2. The self-awareness and control over your own thoughts

A high self-awareness level helps in controlling one’s thoughts. It is very important to increase awareness of your own skills. People who are not strong in metacognitive thinking generally tend to overestimate or underestimate themselves completely. As a result, they face major setbacks more quickly than someone who is aware of their capabilities.

Someone who is aware of his own abilities, either teacher or student, can proceed more quickly to improve in lesser areas.

3. The ability to devise helpful strategies at each stage of a task

Before any task, students can use metacognitive thinking to think about which strategy would work best for the specific problem. What strategy has worked for a similar problem before? What would be a good first step? As they complete the task, students can use metacognitive thinking to make sure they stay on track and that what they are doing actually works.

After completing a task, students can have a self-debrief that is accurate and consistent across all tasks. This ensures that emotions do not get in the way of judgment and learning.

Summary of Metacognition

Thinking about thinking. Metacognition quite literally means raising awareness of consciousness. Metacognition was first proposed by John Flavell and has since been broadly developed and deployed widely.

The term metacognition distinguishes between metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation. Metacognitive knowledge encompasses everything people know about their personal cognitive processes. Metacognitive regulation refers to managing and improving their cognitive processes to enhance learning.

Metacognitive knowledge is also divided into person variables, strategy variables and task variables. Person variables refer to what someone knows about his or her weaknesses in learning and processing new information. Strategy variables are about the strategies available to someone to approach problems in different ways. Task variables are about what someone already knows about a particular task and the requirements to perform this task.

Metacognitive regulation also has three components. First, there is the concept of planning. Planning refers to the allocation of the right resources and the selection of the right strategies for solving a problem. Monitoring involves awareness of understanding and task performance and evaluation refers to assessing the final product and process prior to the finished product.

There are several methods for training metacognition. The most important of these is self-questioning. Self-questioning stimulates the user to think actively before, during and after learning. Thinking aloud promotes metacognitions by getting people to actively think about what they read or consider. Visualisations serve to support the thinking process by organising thoughts, uncovering connections between different things and visualising processes and procedures.

Closely related to the word metacognition are the different learning styles. Anyone who knows or knows and thinks about thinking knows which learning style suits him or her best. Examples of different learning styles are visual, auditory, kinaesthetic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal and interpersonal.

Now it is your turn

What do you think? Do you recognise yourself in the explanation of the Drill Down method? Is this tool used in your own working environment? If not, do you think this could be valuable in your work? What other helpful troubleshooting methods and tools do you know? What do you believe are pros and cons of the Drill Down technique? Do you have any tips or solutions?

Share your experience and knowledge in the comments box below.

If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our Free Newsletter for the latest posts on models and methods. You can also find us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.

More information

  1. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Metacognition. Sage Publications.
  2. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
  3. Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview.
  4. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. MIT Press.
  5. Nelson, T. O. (1992). Metacognition: Core readings. Allyn & Bacon.

How to cite this article:
Janse, B. (2020). Metacognition. Retrieved [insert date] from toolshero: https://www.toolshero.com/psychology/metacognition/

Add a link to this page on your website:
<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/psychology/metacognition/”>toolshero: Metacognition</a>

Did you find this article interesting?

Your rating is more than welcome or share this article via Social media!

Average rating 4.5 / 5. Vote count: 2

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Join us and get unlimited access

By joining our e-learning platform, you will get unlimited access to all (1000+) articles, templates, videos and many more!

Tagged:

Leave a Reply