This article explains the Learning Styles, further developed by David Kolb, in a practical way. After reading you will understand the basics of this powerful management tool.
The American psychologist David Kolb developed, together with Roger Fry the Experiential Learning Model (ELM) for effective learning in the 1970s.
This management model is also known as the four stages of learning or the Kolb’s Learning Styles.
The Learning Styles theory named the four stages of learning, made clear that there is not just one learning style but that there are more methods and that individuals have their own preferred learning styles.
David Kolb discovered that people are inclined to particularly develop the learning phase they are good at.
This is why he thinks that it is good to pay attention to the ways of learning they are less proficient at.
Because of such diversity, people can go through the learning cycle in a more complete and balanced way so that each phase gets a proportionate amount of attention.
A group of people exhibits this diversity by nature as a result of which the group members complement each other as a matter of course.
Four stages of learning
David Kolb bases his four stages of learning on two major opposite dimensions, namely “Concrete versus Abstract” and “Active versus Reflective”.
In practice, it appears that adults (as opposed to children) depending on experience and stage of life, first need to unlearn things before they can learn something new.
Sometimes people need to come to terms with (undesired) experiences before they are open to new views.
What are the Learning Styles?
Within the dimensions, the learning styles theory is based on a stage theoretical model.
David Kolb distinguishes four learning behaviours with four learning styles:
Doers displays a combination of active experimentation and concrete experience.
Doers prefer situations in which they can set to work as quickly as possible and they learn best when there is room for gaining immediate experience by doing things.
Doers are open to new learning opportunities, good at solving problems and they are challenged by taking on unfamiliar tasks.
Reflectors have a preference for concrete experience and reflective observation. Reflectors like to think about something first and they are great at lateral problem-solving.
They want to consider all possible angles and implications of a problem and they never fail to see new approaches and solutions.
They are dreamers that do not wish to be hurried and they want to take time before making a decision.
Thinkers combine reflexive observation with abstract conceptualization. They like turning their observations into coherent hypotheses and theories.
They do well at verbal reasoning and they prefer to work independently.
They learn best in structured learning situations with clear goals, theories and models. They would like to be able to ask questions and discuss topics.
Deciders have a preference for abstract conceptualization and active experimentation. Deciders like trying out theories in practice.
They often take the initiative, are problem-solvers and they make decisions.
They learn best by clear and briefly formulated rules and principles they can immediately implement in practice.
They are practical people that do not like wasting time.
Four stages of the learning cycle
The learning styles model is a cyclical process in which people must work through each of the four learning stages.
This does not necessarily have to be from the same starting point, but preferably in the same order.
According to David Kolb the learning process becomes easier by going through the four stages of learning despite people’s preference for a certain stage.
Until recently, many training courses focused on the assimilation learning style; reflection and theory building.
People were taught how certain things interrelate and how they can be considered in a theoretical framework.
Often, little attention was paid to the accommodating learning style (experimentation and experiencing).
By doing something, people gain experience (doer). Then people look back on what happened (reflector). Subsequently, people establish links between these reflections and observations and they create a theory (thinker).
Finally, people think how things can (still) be improved and they will try and implement this in practice (decider).
All-round learners are often proficient in all of the four learning styles.
It’s Your Turn
What do you think?Is the Learning Styles theory applicable in today’s management and personal development methods? Are there still four stages or are there new ones? What is your experience with these learning styles?
Share your experience and knowledge in the comments box below.
- Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, 1, 227-247.
- Stice, J. E. (1987). Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering education, 77(5), 291-96.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
- Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The modern American college, 232-255.
How to cite this article:
Mulder, P. (2013). Learning styles. Retrieved [insert date] from ToolsHero: https://www.toolshero.com/management/learning-styles/
Add a link to this page on your website:
<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/management/learning-styles/”>ToolsHero.com: Learning styles</a>
Did you find this article interesting?
Your rating is more than welcome or share this article via Social media!