SWOT Analysis explained including a template
The SWOT analysis helps you get a clear picture of where you stand and what your real priorities are, all in one overview. This is useful when everything feels important, but time, budget, and attention are limited. By weighing your strengths and weaknesses against opportunities and threats, you avoid making decisions based on gut feeling. You’ll more quickly see where you can accelerate, where you need to make adjustments, and which risks you shouldn’t ignore.
In this article, you’ll discover what a SWOT analysis is, where the model comes from, and how to distinguish between internal and external factors. You’ll get a clear step-by-step plan, practical questions for each section, real-world examples, and tips to avoid common mistakes. You’ll also find a SWOT analysis template so you can get started right away and translate the results into concrete decisions.
What is a SWOT Analysis?
A SWOT analysis, also called a SWOT matrix or SWOT model, is a simple way to look at a situation before making a strategic choice.
The model helps you bring four things together: what is strong, what is weak, where opportunities may appear and which risks could get in the way.
- Strengths: internal qualities that give an organization, team or project an advantage;
- Weaknesses: internal limitations that may slow progress or reduce performance;
- Opportunities: external developments that could create room for growth or improvement;
- Threats: external developments that could create pressure, risk or setbacks.
The value of a SWOT analysis is not only in filling in the four boxes. The real insight comes from the comparison. Which strengths can help you use an opportunity? Which weaknesses make a threat more serious? And what does that mean for the next decision?
A SWOT analysis works best when there is a clear question behind it. What decision needs support? Is it about a new project, a market choice, an internal improvement or the direction of the organization?
With that question in mind, the analysis becomes more useful. Strengths and weaknesses show what helps or limits the organization from the inside. Opportunities and threats show what is happening outside the organization that may create space or pressure.
The origin of SWOT is not linked to one person or one exact date. The model is usually connected to strategic research and consulting work from the 1960s and 1970s. Names that often appear in this context are Edmund P. Learned and his colleagues, Albert Humphrey and the Stanford Research Institute.
SWOT also did not appear out of nowhere. It likely developed from earlier ways of looking at organizations, markets and strategic choices. The SOFT analysis is often mentioned as one of those earlier forms.
That practical background explains why SWOT is still used so often. It is easy to understand, quick to apply and useful in discussions about strategy. Not because the model gives the answer by itself, but because it helps people see the situation more clearly and choose priorities with more focus.
Internal and External Factors
The SWOT analysis identifies internal and external factors for an internal and external analysis. The internal factors are the strengths and weaknesses of a SWOT matrix.
Examples of internal business factors for strengths and weaknesses include financial resources, the organization’s location, employees, software and systems, legal elements such as patents and copyrights, and business processes.
Another useful management tool for mapping internal factors is the McKinsey 7S Framework. External factors consist of opportunities and threats arising from the organization’s environment, such as market developments, regulations, and economic trends. Examples of external factors include the market, demographic and economic trends, supplier and partner relationships, and regulation.
Two useful management tools that can help provide insight into this are the DESTEP analysis and the PEST analysis. The results are often presented in a SWOT matrix.
Tip: The SWOT matrix can provide a good overview of the internal and external analysis. There are, however, a couple of points to consider when presenting the results. Lists and bullet points can have an underlying agenda. This can lead to premature conclusions. Another point to consider is priorities. If priorities aren’t made clear, people will quickly draw their own conclusions.
How to Conduct a SWOT Analysis, Plus an Example
Creating a SWOT analysis always begins with defining a desired end state or desirable objectives.
Partly for this reason, a SWOT analysis can be an excellent tool that forms part of strategic planning.

The 4 Elements of a SWOT-Analysis
Download the SWOT Analysis model in high resolution
This high resolution image is exclusively for our paying Toolshero members. Click here to see if a membership is something for you!
Creating a strategic plan takes preparation. A SWOT analysis may look simple, but the input behind it should be checked carefully. That means looking at internal data, customer signals, market developments, competitors, finances and operational issues. Depending on the size of the organization, this can take time and cost money.
The four parts of the SWOT analysis help bring that information together. Below is a short explanation of each element:
Strengths
Strengths are the things that help a project or organization move toward its goal. They show what is already working well and where there may be an advantage.
Useful questions are:
- What value do customers get from us?
- What do we do better than competitors?
- Why would customers choose us instead of another provider?
- Which Unique Selling Points, or USPs, are actually strong?
- Which factors influence the customer’s buying decision most?
Be specific when describing strengths. “Good service” is still quite broad. “Fast response time for business customers” says more. The same applies to quality, expertise, brand recognition or customer loyalty.
It also helps to look at strengths from more than one angle. What does the organization see internally? What do customers notice? And how does the market compare the organization with competitors?
Stay realistic. A strength is only a real strength when it matters in relation to the goal and the market. If competitors already offer high-quality products, then quality alone may not be enough. In that case, the real strength may be craftsmanship, better ingredients, faster delivery or a more reliable customer experience.
Weaknesses
Weaknesses are the internal points that can slow down a project or organization. They show where performance, quality, speed or cooperation may be under pressure.
Useful questions are:
- What needs to improve inside the organization?
- Which mistakes or habits should be avoided in this project?
- Which weaknesses do our customers notice?
- Why do customers choose another provider?
- Where are we losing time, quality, money or market share?
This part of the SWOT analysis can be uncomfortable. Strengths are usually easier to name. Weaknesses ask for more honesty. That is why it helps to involve others. Colleagues, customers, suppliers or external advisers may see things that are missed internally. Their view can be confronting, but it often makes the analysis more useful.
A weakness is not meant to blame people. It shows where attention is needed before the problem becomes larger or starts to affect the goal.
Opportunities
Opportunities are developments outside the organization that may create room to move. They can help a project grow, improve or become more relevant for the market.
Useful questions are:
- Which trends are becoming stronger in the market?
- Where do customers ask for something that is not yet offered well?
- Which changes in technology, policy or behaviour could work in our favour?
- Are there new suppliers, partners or channels that make something possible?
These opportunities usually come from the wider environment. For example, new technology, changes in laws or government policy, different customer needs, market growth, sustainability pressure or shifts in the target group.
Still, an opportunity is not the same as a trend. A trend only becomes useful when the organization can do something with it. If the knowledge, budget, timing or customer fit is missing, it may be interesting, but not yet a real opportunity.
Threats
Threats are developments outside the organization that can make the goal harder to reach. They may come from the market, competitors, technology, legislation, suppliers or changing customer expectations.
Useful questions are:
- Which external risks could slow down the project or organization?
- Are competitors becoming stronger, cheaper or more innovative?
- Could new technology make our product, service or way of working less relevant?
- Are customer expectations changing faster than we can respond?
- Do our weaknesses become more serious because of what is happening in the market?
- Do we still meet the quality standards that customers and the market expect?
A threat is not always an immediate problem. Sometimes it is still developing in the background. Think of a new competitor, rising costs, stricter rules or a technology that customers start to prefer.
That is why this part of the SWOT analysis needs attention. It helps the organization look beyond the current situation. What could put pressure on the plan later? And which risks should be taken seriously before they become urgent?
What do you do after a SWOT analysis?
A SWOT analysis provides an overview, but it doesn’t automatically make it clear what the best choice is. In practice, this is often the difference between a useful analysis and a list that ends up in a drawer. The results only become truly valuable once it becomes clear which points take priority and which combinations carry the most strategic weight.
That is why the step following the SWOT analysis is so important. Once the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats have been identified, the next step is to translate them into coherence and direction. This is done using the confrontation matrix. This model helps to consciously juxtapose internal and external factors. This reveals where growth opportunities lie, where improvements are needed first, and which risks require immediate attention.
With a confrontation matrix, the SWOT analysis thus becomes more concrete. A strength only truly gains meaning when it becomes clear which opportunity that strength provides an advantage for. A weakness only becomes urgent when it becomes clear which threat will be exacerbated by it. This means that the confrontation matrix helps us look not only at what is happening, but especially at what needs to be done about it.
The confrontation matrix typically reveals four types of combinations:
- Strengths and opportunities: where can the organization accelerate or grow?
- Weaknesses and opportunities: what needs to be improved first to capitalize on opportunities?
- Strengths and threats: which qualities help mitigate risks?
- Weaknesses and threats: where is the organization most vulnerable?
It is precisely this comparison that guides strategic decisions. This makes it clearer more quickly which issues deserve priority and which are less urgent. This prevents all outcomes from feeling equally important, whereas in practice, focus is essential.
A SWOT analysis without a comparison matrix therefore often remains purely descriptive. While it provides insight, it offers little guidance for follow-up actions. By adding the comparison matrix, an assessment transforms into a decision-making tool. This makes the analysis more useful for strategy, policy, and implementation.
The SWOT analysis shows what is at stake. The confrontation matrix helps turn that into priorities and strategic choices. That is precisely why this step is important when the outcome must be not only informative but also actionable.
SWOT Analysis Tips
The SWOT analysis works best when there is buy-in from the people who influence the choices, the implementation, and the decision-making.
This is crucial for the continued development of strategic planning. Also ensure that the goals set within the SWOT analysis are realistic and achievable so that people can stand behind the resulting decisions and policies.
In addition, the SWOT Analysis is often used to identify areas for development, which can be useful when exploring opportunities, such as in a feasibility study.
It is wise not to eliminate an identified element too quickly. The value of an individual SWOT point is primarily evident in the strategic options that arise from it.
An element only becomes truly relevant when it helps to identify actionable strategic options. If that outcome is lacking, the strategic value is usually limited.
A SWOT Analysis can contribute to decision-making when a desired end state (objective) has been defined. Examples include: nonprofit organizations, government agencies, and individuals. SWOT analyses can also be used in pre-crisis planning and preventive crisis management.
Tip: The SWOT analysis is a classic strategic tool that provides insight into internal and external factors before searching for a “blue ocean”. Then discover how you can create new, competition-free markets with the Blue Ocean Strategy.
SWOT Analysis Example: Telecom Provider
A team of business analysts at a telecom provider works closely together on strategic planning. This is the SWOT analysis they will incorporate into their short-, medium-, and long-term objectives.
Strengths
- We deliver high-quality products with fast service.
- Customer satisfaction rating of 8.
- One of the top three providers in the Netherlands.
Weaknesses
- Complaints: 10% of weekly correspondence.
- Much critical knowledge is held by long-serving employees, creating a risk when they leave.
- Cash flow is unstable.
Opportunities
- There is a need to expand our services, particularly in mobile and Internet.
- We are quicker to adopt new technologies than our competitors.
Threats
- Foreign providers are interested in a takeover (merger with their organization)
- The government regularly tightens regulations regarding customer data and service provision
As a result of the above SWOT Analysis, this telecom provider will respond more effectively to customer complaints with the help of the marketing department.
In addition, additional investors will be attracted to enable the organization to grow specifically in mobile services and the Internet. This will create greater clout and strengthen the company’s position against foreign providers.
SWOT Analysis Example in a Healthcare Organization
A medium-sized healthcare facility wants to improve staff retention and increase patient satisfaction.
Strengths
- Highly educated and committed healthcare professionals.
- Strong reputation in the region.
- Good collaboration with general practitioners and hospitals.
Weaknesses
- High workload and absenteeism due to illness.
- Lack of modern HR tools.
- Few structured feedback sessions with employees.
Opportunities
- Innovation through e-health and digital monitoring.
- Regional subsidies for sustainable employability.
- Growth of collaboration in healthcare networks.
Threats
- Nationwide staffing shortage in healthcare.
- Increasing administrative requirements.
- Competition from commercial healthcare providers.
The SWOT analysis shows that internal engagement is a strength that must be maintained, but only if workload and technology are addressed.
The organization decides to digitize HR processes and introduce periodic feedback sessions. In this way, internal weaknesses are linked to external opportunities—a direct application of strategic thinking via SWOT.
SWOT analysis template
Start describing the different aspects of the Analysis with this ready to use SWOT analysis template.
Download the SWOT analysis template
For members only | Get instant access to this SWOT analysis template plus unlimited access to 1,200+ expert articles and tools. Explore Membership Options
Advantages and Limitations
A key strength of the SWOT analysis is its practical approach. The model is easy to apply and helps a team quickly establish an overview and direction.
This practical SWOT analysis also helps set direction (defining objectives) and determines follow-up actions/steps (priority, impact, and necessary resources).
Unfortunately, the SWOT analysis also has its limitations. The execution of the SWOT analysis is a snapshot / a snapshot in strategic planning.
This can have consequences for the further development of strategy implementation. Its practical nature can also lead to hasty conclusions or unrealistic expectations.
Recommended books and articles on SWOT analysis
The SWOT analysis helps to connect internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats. These books provide a solid foundation for the model and show how SWOT fits into strategic thinking, while the articles provide insight into the origins, application, and further development of SWOT and TOWS. This gives you a clear framework for better understanding the analysis and using it in a targeted way in strategy, policy, and decision-making.
- Dosher, M., Benepe, O., Humphrey, A., Stewart, R., & Lie, B. (1960). The SWOT analysis method. Mento Park, CA, Stanford Research Institute.
- Fine, L. G. (2009). The Swot Analysis: Using Your Strength to Overcome Weaknesses, Using Opportunities to Overcome Threats. Createspace.
- Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame & fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press. → A classic work that explains in detail the relationship between reputation, brand value, and organizational culture. A relevant addition to strategic marketing models.
- Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. The Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994-1006. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832. → This article provides a clear overview of the theory behind SWOT and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the model.
- Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215-251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837. → Review article discussing the development of SWOT analysis and highlighting the limitations of the method in modern contexts.
- Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. → This book demonstrates how SWOT is used to combine internal and external analysis in strategic choices.
- Humphrey, A. (2005). SWOT analysis for management consulting. SRI Alumni Newsletter (SRI International), 1.
- Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management. Harlow, UK: Pearson. → This book places SWOT in the context of marketing analysis and helps to translate it into market and positioning.
- Panagiotou, G. (2003). Bringing SWOT into focus. Business Strategy Review, 14(2), 8–10. → This article shows why SWOT is often used too superficially and how you can make the analysis more focused and useful.
- Pickton, D. W., & Wright, S. (1998). What’s SWOT in strategic analysis? London, UK: Routledge. → This book-like work delves deeper into the logic of SWOT and clarifies the conditions necessary to make the analysis truly useful.
- Puyt, R. W., Lie, F. B., de Graaf, F. J., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). The origins of SWOT analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(3), Article 102304. → This article provides historical insight and shows how SWOT and SOFT have developed in strategic planning.
- Sarsby, A. (2016). SWOT analysis: A tool for making better business decisions (3rd ed.). Routledge. → This book provides practical assistance in applying SWOT in a business context, with examples of how factors can be identified and interpreted.
- Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS Matrix: A Tool for Situational Analysis. New York, NY: Long Range Planning Publications. → This book closely ties in with SWOT in terms of content and shows how to convert observations into strategic options using the TOWS matrix.
- Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Toward Global Sustainability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. → This book uses SWOT as an integral part of strategic diagnosis and makes its application in organizations concrete.
How to cite this article:
Van Vliet, V. (2010). SWOT analysis. Retrieved [insert date] from Toolshero.com: https://www.toolshero.com/strategy/swot-analysis/
Original publication date: March 22, 2010 | Last update: April 29, 2026
Add a link to this page on your website:
<a href=”https://www.toolshero.com/strategy/swot-analysis/”> Toolshero.com: SWOT analysis</a>
6 responses to “SWOT Analysis explained including a template”
We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community.
Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done an impressive job and our whole community will be grateful to you.
Thank you; we do our best to make management knowledge open and accessible.
Hi, yeah this article is genuinely nice and I have learned lot of things from it on the topic of blogging.
thanks.
Hi, thank you for interesting article! Have some additions about this topic.
To use all the possible advantages of SWOT analysis in practice after drawing up a list of Strengths (S) and Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O) and Threats (T) you should compose a confrontational matrix which contains 4 quadrants for all intersections: O:S; O:W; T:S; T:W.
Next step is to write down all decisions for each quadrant, for example, if we earlier identified 2 O’s and 2 S’s then O:S quadrant will include pairs O1:S1; O1:S2; O2:S1; O2:S2. Another 3 quadrants you fill similarly. Decisions in O:S quadrant are called Strategic priority, decisions in T:W quadrant – Central problem. This Priority and Problem then go to your strategy.
Hi Alexander, thank you for your reaction and great additions. We have the confrontational matrix, also called TOWS Matrix, listed as a new article to write and publish.
This post is a fantastic insight into SWOT Analysis! Whilst it is a simple and effective analysis technique, it must be conducted in the right way to be fully effective. I am sure many people will benefit from your guide and the tips that you have provided.